How has El Salvador changed since Bitcoin became legal tender?
When the country embraced the cryptocurrency in 2021, the world watched San Salvador as if it were an open-air economic laboratory. People spoke of a financial revolution, crypto-driven tourism, foreign investment inflows, and a new economic model for emerging nations. But after the initial excitement, the experiment took a more complicated turn: international pressure, very low real-world adoption, and constantly shifting regulations have reshaped Bitcoin’s role into something quite different from the bold vision first presented.
What is the current situation?
In January 2025, El Salvador has made a significant reversal on its pioneering decision to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender, the Legislative Assembly approved changes to the Bitcoin Law, removing its status as a mandatory “currency,” although Bitcoin remains “legal tender” on a voluntary basis.

Among the key changes is the end of the requirement for businesses to accept Bitcoin for payments, a rule that was initially mandatory. The new legislation also prohibits using Bitcoin for paying taxes or settling government debts. Additionally, the famous government-backed Chivo wallet, which was launched to facilitate Bitcoin adoption, is being scaled down.
These reforms are partly a result of a deal with the International Monetary Fund (IMF): the $1.4 billion loan granted to El Salvador included conditions to “mitigate the potential risks of the Bitcoin project.”

Despite this regulatory rollback, President Nayib Bukele’s administration continues to reaffirm its commitment to Bitcoin. The government is still buying BTC for its strategic reserve. According to official data, government holdings exceed 6,100 bitcoin, worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
On the regulatory front, a new crypto framework came into effect in March 2025, focused on voluntary adoption and compliance. There is now a supervisory body, the National Commission on Digital Assets (CNAD), overseeing licensing and digital-asset regulation.

However, on a practical level, public use of Bitcoin remains very low. Sources report that active user penetration was around 3–4% in early 2025. This underscores a persistent challenge: despite strong institutional push, most Salvadorans have not embraced Bitcoin for daily transactions.
Conclusion
El Salvador appears to be stepping back from its boldest cryptocurrency experiment: Bitcoin is still legal, but no longer mandatory or integrated into its fiscal system. Meanwhile, the government continues to bolster its Bitcoin reserves while building a more mature, less coercive regulatory ecosystem.