βπ π¨ ππͺ π₯ππ π¦πππ₯π€ ππ£π π π π βπ¦ππππ£πππ πππ πΌπππππ€π πππππ¦πππ βππ§π ππ¦π₯ ππ£π π¦π‘: ππππππππ
Online marketing is my calling, so many of you might guess that I usually research the possibilities of social networks. The possibilities in this area promise a wide arsenal. However, for reaching the subjects of a database in a targeted manner, I think the best platform idea for this is Reid Hoffman's original solution, LinkedIn, which of course has since been acquired by M$.
π€ Why do I think it's a good π‘idea to initiate the creation of such a groupβ
Β
While crowd theory fails in politics, because the larger the crowd, the more heterogeneous it becomes this phenomenon can be effective for other goals. π
β In case of FinTech products such as Revolut which has always common goalsβ
But the point is that the homogeneous mass generated in the group and well-targeted marketing could exert enormous pressure on politics itself, don't forget, unfortunately the fate of Revolut depends on politics surround. Unfortunately, this is the fate of all centralized platforms, yet Revolut is the πbridge between the possibilities of different FinTech companies to develop.Β
π£ Just think of free of charge SEPA EUR transfers.Β
Revolut helps many people learn about the platforms of other FinTech companies precisely because of its aforementioned bridge-like characteristics.
π£οΈ So, why would it be worthwhile to form a larger mass within a Revolut relevant topic groupβ
Sharing knowledge about Revolut, that is, helping each other, is of course always a noble goal.
However, I would like to outline the essence with the following very important question, for example, concerning Hungary. You should read, because on the topic of Revolut, this could affect also, on you're country at any time. π
The future of Revolut in Hungary is currently in questionβ
- Will Revolut open a headquarters in Hungary,
- or in a more fortunate case, will it only maintain a branch?
- In an even more fortunate case, maybe not even that?
Although the legal environment differs somewhat from country to country, it is quite harmonious in the EU region, for example.
What happens when Revolut opens a headquarters in a countryβ
The laws codified in the given countries usually always affect companies with domestic territorial scope. So it definitely affects companies with headquarters. Politics, disguised as democracy, usually always claims to act in the interest of the majority. However, in reality it does the exact opposite, because it always oppresses the majority. According to the laws of nature, it cannot do anything else, because the majority are poor, they form the mass from which the given βnation-stateβ can earn income.
This means that if politics puts pressure on Revolut, it will pass this on to its customers which could pain in fees. The transaction tax is one of many niceties.
Of course, there are some regulations for companies without headquarters, but in my opinion, they can be much freerβ
What could put more pressure on a companyβ
- Maybe the political environment?
- Or is it its own clientele that, what develops capital?
Since politics is in the pockets of capital everywhere, I vote for the latter. π
So, for the sake of these kinds of interesting topics and consumer pressure, this group idea of ββmine could be useful. At most, something could happen on the aforementioned LinkedIn platform. I don't see any chance of it anywhere else.
ππ , ππ π₯πππ€π π₯ππ£ππ π¨π π£ππ€ πππ₯ππ£ππ€π₯ πͺπ π¦, like Revolut, FinTech, LinkedIn, and of course you recognize that among online marketing tools, a π₯π₯ group can achieve the greatest π― targeting,
π then do what needs to be done. β¬οΈ