Without a doubt, the cryptospace moves in high velocity, and one of the new growth cycles in the past 90 days is Yield Farming.

Yield farming refers to the process of putting your assets to work across various Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocols for the best possible returns. Yield farmers could earn returns upwards of 1,000% Annual Percentage Yield (APY) by deploying different strategies of varying risk levels.

Yield farming really took off after Compound kick-started its COMP yield farming incentives for both lenders and borrowers on the Compound platform. Shortly after the launch of Compound’s yield farming programme, many other DeFi protocols also incorporated yield farming strategies such as Balancer (BAL), Yearn.Finance (YFI), Curve.Finance (CRV) and SushiSwap (SUSHI) to name a few.

According to our data, the total market cap of yield farming tokens stands at $3.5 billion with YFI taking 25% of this share as of 21st September 2020. According to DeFiPulse, DeFi as a whole had a Total Value Locked of over $9 billion, which is a 300% increase since July 2020.

However, yield farming isn’t as easy as it seems. Only sophisticated DeFi natives would know how to do it profitably as this agriculture game requires close monitoring and constant changes in strategies. We at CoinGecko wanted to gain some insights into the following three things in yield farming:

• Is the yield farming rage sustainable and here to stay?
• Do yield farmers understand the associated risks and rewards when farming?
• What are the most significant pain points for retail users to be a yield farmer? 

To find out, we surveyed 1,347 people in August 2020. Here are four key findings:

1. 23% of the respondents have participated in yield farming in the past 60 days, illustrating that yield farming is still a niche but growing trend.
2. Each yield-farming token made up less than 10% of the farmers’ holdings.
3. 52% of farmers put up less than $1,000 in capital to farm and the high gas fee is one of the biggest concerns.
4. 40% of farmers do not know how to read smart contracts and the associated risks despite claiming that they do.

Key Finding #1 -  23% of the respondents have participated in yield farming in the past 60 days, illustrating that yield farming is still a niche but growing trend.

In our survey, we found that yield farmers are still a small subset (312 out of 1,012) of cryptocurrency users who have heard of yield farming. It is dominated by males aged between 30 - 59 years old.

Key takeaway: Yield farming is a niche game for those familiar and comfortable with financial ratios and have been in the crypto space for quite some time. They are familiar with existing and new DeFi protocols to form effective farming strategies.

Key Finding #2 -  Each yield-farming token made up less than 10% of the farmers’ holdings.

To understand yield farmers’ portfolio diversification, we dug deeper into the coins they are currently holding. Farmers are generally seasoned crypto natives, holding a significant portion of Ethereum (ETH) (83%) & Bitcoin (BTC) (74%) in their portfolio, along with a mix of various DeFi-centric tokens.

Key takeaway: The small portion of yield farming tokens in their portfolio may suggest that the tokens are currently being locked in the smart contract pools of the respective protocols they are farming. We also see behavior where farmers would ‘farm and dump’ after accumulating substantial reward tokens in the pool, indicating that yield farming tokens are not to be held long-term.

Key Finding #3 -  52% of farmers put up less than $1,000 in capital to farm, and the high gas fee becomes the biggest concern.

In an attempt to understand how farmers behave when yield farming, we asked them the following questions:

1. What is their average gas fee per transaction?
2. What is their initial capital in their first farm?
3. Did they use leverage in yield farming?
4. Did they manage to turn a profit in yield farming? 

We discovered that more than half of the farmers invested capital of above $1,000 into farming pools, and the majority did not employ leverage in their strategy. 

However, those who farmed with less than $1,000 may not have reaped as much profit due to high gas fees associated with the constant movement between pools and protocols when farming yields, excluding other associated risks such as impermanent loss.

Regardless, these farmers claimed that their return on investment (ROI) was up to 500%. The result is not a surprise find as many of the current new pools provide insanely high APY of over 1,000%. 

Key takeaway: The high gas fees may impede the smaller farmers, and their ROI may not be as high as the ones that invested above $1,000.

Key Finding #4 -  A large portion of the farmers do not know how to read smart contracts despite claiming that they understand the risks associated.

What is shocking to us (or maybe not) is that a large chunk of the farmers do not know how to read smart contracts (40%) and do not even know what impermanent loss is (33%), which implies that they don’t know their real ROI and are extreme risk-takers for the sake of the high returns.

Key takeaway: All farmers should conduct their research before farming in any pools, as there are more copy-paste yield farming tokens that could potentially expose them to a greater risk such as code vulnerability or scams. 

Conclusion

Back to our objectives when conducting the survey: 

• Is the yield farming rage sustainable and here to stay?

• Do yield farmers understand the associated risk and rewards when farming?

• What are the most significant pain points for retail users to be a farmer? 

Our opinion is that the high yield pools are not sustainable, but yield farming products are here to stay. It is now apparent that the yield farming pools introduced by Uniswap recently on 17th September has solidified the yield farming frenzy. Indeed, it is no longer merely a frenzy but has now matured significantly. 

However, until the high gas fee is solved, it is unlikely that retail users can enter farming without hurting their capital, and this is not taking into account other associated risks such as impermanent loss.