"Sugar relationships are not real!"

Well, gee, thanks for that unsolicited opinion attempting to invalidate/undermine other people's relationships because you don't like them, Greg! I will have you know that such relationships have made a significant positive impact on my finances (and will likely continue to), but please tell me more about how your judging and insulting people in attempts to get your dick wet is working out for you! (I'm guessing that miserable fucks like you, whom can't mind their own business and keep their opinions to themselves, are both broke and celibate.)

As far as I can determine, my benefactors, patrons and readers are neither robots nor NPCs in a computer game (the theory of a simulated Universe notwithstanding). They're as real as you and I and so are our relationships (at least to me, anyway, if not to them). Just because you don't see non-sexual relationships as "real" doesn't mean they're fake/invalid, you dumb and entitled schmuck, you miserable muppet!

Clearly, you don't realise that practically anyone whom is employed for wages, in any capacity (and in which pretending to like and respect one's employer is a requirement), is technically in a sugar relationship (not to mention one with a power exchange). All relationships are transactional in nature, to some degree. It just depends on what exactly is being exchanged. For that matter and as far as I am concerned, I am in sugar relationships with the people whom tip my posts here on Pub0x. Here, I put out my ideas/thoughts in writing and (hopefully) get cryptocurrency in return. Sometimes, they even leave comments. That works perfectly well for me. Neither I nor my readers have any issues with that, as far as I know.

Thumbnail image: Poster's own