What is socialism? Arguments by classical liberal thinkers

By Vladan Lausevic | Vlad's politics | 6 Jun 2023


A definition of socialism is that socialism is about the prohibition of free entry into markets. This definition, via the Econlab article, focuses on what socialism does rather than its aims or motives. By emphasizing the restriction on market entry, the author aims to identify a common thread among different visions of socialism by referring to liberal thinkers Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich von Hayek, and Oskar Lange.

Mises argues that under socialism, the absence of private ownership of the means of production leads to the absence of markets and prices, making economic calculation impossible. Mises criticized natural approaches that propose alternative methods of economic calculation based on intrinsic values of goods. Lange, on the other hand, agrees with Mises about the importance of economic calculation but argues that central planners can set prices for factors of production. He suggests using market theory as a substitute for actual markets in socialist systems.

While Hayek responded to Lange by emphasizing the role of knowledge in market economies, he argues that market capitalist prices reflect widely dispersed knowledge about economic conditions, while market socialist prices only reflect the knowledge of the Central Planning Board. Hayek believed that freedom of entry and entrepreneurship are crucial for economic coordination and the discovery of dispersed knowledge in a market system.

Kirzner further develops the idea that entrepreneurship plays a central role in market economies. He suggests that Misesian entrepreneurs solve Hayekian knowledge problems by driving the market towards better coordination. Kirzner highlights the importance of freedom of entry for entrepreneurial activity and argues that a centrally planned economy prohibits entrepreneurship, leading to arbitrary economic calculation.

The author concludes that defining socialism as the prohibition of free entry allows for a distinction between socialism in name and socialism in practice. They also argue that fascism can be considered a form of socialism if it restricts the freedom of individuals to organize production according to their vision. Finally, the author criticizes Lange's market socialism for disregarding the importance of freedom of entry and the entrepreneurial function in decision-making.

What are your thoughts about socialism? 

 

Thanks for reading. You can support and reward my writing via: 

Pay Pal – [email protected]

Algo - NCG6LBALQHENQUSR77KOR6SS42FGK54BZ5L2HFDSBGQVLGYIOVWYDXFDI4

ADA – addr1q9vfs6nqz4xmtnpljwhv4tukyskd2g7enxd87rpugkwwvfun5pnla5d5tes2mvurrc77e7837yd0scrfk063qlha8wgs8d4ynz

Bitcoin 3HbxyDXE9MhNQ8RqsirqgYvFupQzh5Xby2

ETH - 0x8982cdb97bd23f092f78a16a4fc93c5c4607a285

Seeds – vladlausevic

Skycoin – ZxjhWMJRbTNCRQzy5MekZzH4fhdWFCqBP8

Tezos — tz1QrRzkTAKuPKF8dmGW6c1ScEHBUGvoiJBM

How do you rate this article?

4


Vladan Lausevic
Vladan Lausevic

Based in Stockholm, Sweden as a social entrepreneur. Working with decentralization of democracy, climate transformation and economy. For more info, please get in touch with me via [email protected]


Vlad's politics
Vlad's politics

My blog about politics, society and the world in general. For more info, write to me via [email protected]

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.