Practical Microbiology: Stool Cultures

Practical Microbiology: Stool Cultures

By Leonis | STEM stuff | 3 Aug 2020

         Handling stool specimens may not be fun, and I don't need to go into the details. The cultures, on the other hand, are rather straight forward. It's another method to detect diseases in a patient. Note the culture mentioned here is different from the surveillance cultures for stool. It all comes down to what the clinicians are looking for.

         Often, stool cultures can help detect possible outbreaks of Salmonella. The health department could then start looking for the source of the problem.


The key genus of organisms to look for are:






At my work, we employ the following media to aid pathogen identification:

  1. SBA (sheep blood 5%)
  2. SS Chrome (Salmonella/Shigella agar from Hardy)
  3. HE (Hektoen enteric)
  4. Campy (Campylobacter agar)

         One might ask, but what about the TCBS for Vibrio species? I would like to remind everyone that Utah is a landlocked state. The lab uses oxidase test on colonies growing on the SBA to root out possible Vibrio species. They are uncommon and are usually result of acquired infection during travels.










         We start off by looking at the colonies grown on the SBA. The key is to look for GNB (gram negative bacillus) colonies. An oxidase test would help distinguish between normal enteric flora and possible pathogens. BD's oxidase dry slides are our go-to kit.




         If oxidase positive, the organism is then identified through MALDI-TOF method. The result will determine whether or not we need susceptibility testing. We are looking for Aeromonas, Plesiomonas, and Vibrio at this stage.

         In the case where there are no GNBs growing, the lab forwards that finding through callbacks. That's usually not normal.


The SS Chrome


         We are looking for black and clear (sometimes green tinge) colonies. The same MALDI method help us identify the bacteria. Sometimes, other germs such as Pseudomonas, Citrobacter, etc can pose as pathogens. The point is to rule out or confirm the existence of Salmonella and Shigella.




         On a technical level, the MALDI cannot distinguish between Shigella and E. coli. Therefore, susceptibility testings (usually through MicroScan) help differentiating between the two. In all other cases, it's easy to tell those two organisms apart due to other biochemical tests and media.


The HE


         Before we inoculate the HE agar, the specimen incubates in Selenite broth. It's a selective process that would amplify the pathogens we are looking for.




         Here, we are looking for black and green colonies again. This is another place where we could find Aeromonas and Plesiomonas. They could grow alongside of Salmonella/Shigella species. The same red herrings, identification work, etc. from the SS Chrome apply here.





The Campy


         The media needs to be under anaerobic conditions. The lab uses oxidase test, followed by MALDI-TOF to identify Campylobacter species. No susceptibility tests needed for this particular workup.





Other things to look for


         Report overgrowth of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, B. cereus, or yeast. They aren't issues in small numbers compared to other germs. When they are predominant, they are most likely the cause of patient's illness.

         The expected turn around time for stool cultures is about 2 days. The lab sends a sample of every pathogen isolated to the state health department.


The price of that wish ≒ a prelude to demise, a HIVE of souls ≒ moving VIBES

STEM stuff
STEM stuff

General STEM-related musings.

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.