The judge within

The judge within

By Siraj08 | Reflective Essays | 14 hours ago


Critical thinking 


In a world where deceit and misinformation exist to befog our minds, critical thinking remains the mental discipline of examining opinions, claims, and judgments with reasoning, rather than passively assenting to them.

8b341a1e10feb4d2ea160e0824099bc9e45bb3a19974a6fae5b90c52d0d28aeb.jpg

It rejects the random absorption of knowledge from external sources, such as conversations with elders or social media. Obviously, not all such sources are unreliable, but they should not be treated as sources of impeccable truth as some matters are entirely subjective.

Critical thinkers deliberately question, argue, and challenge others by spotting assumptions, inconsistencies and logical flaws.

They may also consider alternative perspectives outside of their own and weigh the available evidence before reaching a conclusion.

The point is...They test before validating.

They do this not because they want to win arguments for their ego or out of a paranoid “nothing is worth trusting” mindset, but out of a strong desire for truth.

This trait is necessary in our daily interactions. It represents intellectual agency and caution—much like a passionate detective who gathers insights and notes before presenting them in a courtroom for a final verdict. The difference is that the judge is your own mind. It is up to you to determine whether the received data is valid, if you are still unsure, or if you choose to dismiss it. This isn’t done in a harsh “the other person is guilty” way; mistakes happen.

Otherwise, there is no harm in identifying errors, even when they turn out to be in your own point of view. In fact, doing so benefits both sides. Critical thinking is never about knowing it all. Admitting that you do not know something yet is a sign of intellectual integrity—it is the capacity to verify your own perspective, knowing that a scratched lens leads to inaccurate vision.

When critical thinking is absent, you will find yourself saying “yes, that’s right, sir” to every statement you hear.

More dangerously, instead of engaging thoughtfully, you might rapidly label a claim as wrong or preposterous after only a brief, superficial investigation.

Responding with disdainfull tone and dismissive language and holding contempt for the received claim are not signs of true critical thinking...they can be poor reasoning wearing the mask of intellectual rigor.

Since Bluntness and politeness are not opposites; in fact, they complement each other in order to provide a reasoned criticism.

This corrupted version of thinking is often mistaken for “honest critique”, leading to a rigid, false mindset of “only what comes from me is true.”

This doesn’t just ruin one’s reputation or relationships; it makes you judgmental, bitter, self-centered, and closed-minded. At that point, disengaging from the matter and moving on with your life feels much healthier.

In the end, critical thinking is the skill of choosing truth over convenience which makes it crucial and beneficial as long as it’s done thoughtfully.

 

Thanks for reading ㋡ ♡

     

(Creator's substack for more similar content=.https://substack.com/@siraj08gn?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=8spmh3 )

How do you rate this article?

1


Siraj08
Siraj08

An essayist that wants to expand his writing skills from a mere personal hobby to a source of outcome


Reflective Essays
Reflective Essays

The same as the name. This blog examines multiple topics and aspect of life. Balancing between real life pragmatism and abstract existentialism

Publish0x

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.

Page not displaying correctly?