“Booble, the world must know of your ways.  I will fight
for your survival.  One day people will understand and
stop destroying your homes and killing your kind. 
I'll return next year, and protect you, Booble.”
Timothy Treadwell

Humanity is the only species in the history of the world to actually imagine it has more than 2 genders.  No other species in the history of the planet has ever asked this question.  The complete lack of gorilla literature on the subject speaks silent, unequivocal volumes.

This means one of two things:

Suddenly, over the last several years, out of nowhere, humanity has instantaneously evolved into the enlightened, spiritually-advanced position of basing the most-important aspects of its identity on its preferred method of achieving orgasm, an obvious sign of progress and heightened evolution, or

Humanity is debased beyond belief, and has a moral culpability nonexistent in other animals, a capacity to choose between right and wrong, up and down, morality and degeneracy, which must either be ignored, or addressed and dealt with.

"We can ignore reality, but we can't ignore
the consequences of ignoring reality."
Ayn Rand

I have scoured the world to find even a single tome of dolphin literature on the topic of morality and transgenderism and, more than merely not finding any books on the topic, in fact I find a complete absence of books at all, written by any dolphins anywhere.

I have spent countless exhaustive hours reading the giants of elephant philosophy, only to wake up and discover I was dreaming, and that no elephants anywhere have ever written anything.

It's as if humans are more than merely animals, and have an eternal spirit which is aware of its own culpability, in ways that animals simply are not.

It's as though humanity has been burdened with intent, which is why it's possible for a human being to commit murder, while no grizzly bears or sharks have ever been charged with a crime for mauling anything to death, not even humans.

I have visited the forest in search of the bear who has passed the Grizzly Bear Bar, and is capable of explaining the difference in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd-degree homicide, manslaughter, and simply killing something yummy and eating it under a tree.  However, there are no legal documents anywhere in the world of the grizzly bears.  Not even Timothy Treadwell believed grizzly bears had malice or evil intent in their hearts.  By his own admission, it's why he preferred their company.

To believe that there is more to humanity than simple instinct and desire, to even consider the possibility, it is of course necessary to have a critical mind, willing to consider the possibility that strength is not defined by indulging every appetite as immediately as possible, and that humans who do so are more than simple, falsely-enlightened animals acting on hunger and/or hormones, and that it is possible for hypocrisy and self-righteousness to creep into the hearts and minds of creatures burdened with intent and moral culpability.

It is necessary to consider the possibility that there is indeed a missing link, and that this missing link isn't a short gorilla lady from the wild, unrecorded golden days of the noble beast, like Luc Besson clearly presumptuously believes, even telling us at the end of his overrated-but-not-unwatchable film Lucy that, now that we've heard the truth, what are we gonna do with it, which isn't self-important or prideful at all.

It is necessary to consider the possibility that the missing link is sin.

Sin is what makes murder, rape, theft, and countless other crimes possible.  Sin is what separates us from the animals.  Our eternal nature aches and yearns for the peaceful equilibrium of the holy eternity we were created for, but our sin nature keeps us chained to the grave.

David Wojnarowicz seemed to be aware of it, even as an openly-gay artist who showed no interest in repenting from the sin that fuels the flames of hell in this self-portrait from 1983-84:

You can say that it is the "flames of passion" which have been depicted, which is indeed a possibility.  I strongly suggest you ask why human beings are the only creatures in the world burdened with "flames of passion," but as a  free moral agent, you are free to ignore the question.  Study the painting and search your own heart and make up your own mind,

But remember, when Jesus said "Seek and ye shall find" in Matthew 7:7, there are 2 things He didn't say.  He didn't say "blindly believe and ye shall find," and He didn't say you can't discard what you find.

Seeking, of course, involves asking questions.  "Am I a good person, really?"  "Am I nothing more than a bundle of nervous appetites that I spend my life slavishly indulging as often as possible, or is there something more?"

It is possible to blindly believe in your own lack of moral responsibility, because that's what everybody does.  This may or may not be an act of religious faith, but if you haven't asked the question, you have chosen to blindly believe whatever it pleases you to believe.

Blind faith, in anything, is the opposite of seeking.

Jesus didn't condone it.

It's possible that it's desperately necessary to seek the truth of the matter of our own moral culpability, before it's too late.  It's also possible that nothing matters and the hopes and dreams and desire for love and peace in our hearts are a simple matter of instinct and appetite, and that there is no reason not to engage in sudden, unquestioned evolution into an imaginary gender never before seen in the history of the planet, if you want to.

It's possible your imagination and the desires that follow it with golden baskets of flower petals like a Roman slave boy are entirely valid, and are half-living proof of the advanced evolution of a species that paradoxically calls itself "spiritual" when faced with the question of "organized religion," never actually considering the degree to which they've been enslaved like religious devotees to the degenerate dogma of their own unquestioned desires.

It's also possible that you've been deceived, and will face the consequences of your sin when you die, whether you like it, believe it, or not.

Good luck in your search for the animal library that will ease your conscience and tell it it doesn't exist so that it can continue with the business of congratulating itself on its strength and power without having to worry about the need for atonement that nags just below the surface of the heart of everyone who hasn't seared their conscience with the self-righteous religious arrogance of the type found in a University, mainline megachurch, or late-period Luc Besson movie.  When you don't find it, read the gospel of John in a King James Bible.  Continue from there.

Thanks for listening.