Welcome back to the factual battle, moonbats! In this installment we are going to explore another aspect of the ominous "coincidental" parallels between the twin pandemics as presented by the corporate "mainstream" media and outlined in my original article.

Buckle up, moonbats! This is about to get outrageous. Let's jump back into the information stream and see what bites.

As I previously noted in part one, the CDC guidelines for dealing with both the Fauci Flu and Fentanyl Fever include recommendations for the use of PPE and isolation/decontamination chambers to protect first responders and "front line" health care workers by mitigating their risk of exposure. [1][2]

As the panic over the alleged virus was ramping up, the media treated us to a stream of images featuring first responders in full hazmat gear as they removed suspected infectious individuals from their homes. We were shown portable decontamination chambers set up at hospitals, which we were told were entirely necessary to prevent the spread of infection. [3][4]

Celebrities even got into the act with, for one example, photos of supermodel Naomi Campbell wearing a full hazmat suit through LAX on her way to board a flight. This particular stunt got worldwide exposure and helped to augment the fear of the Fauci Flu. [5]

However, it's been a good minute since we've seen any of that being done, hasn't it?

Bear with me here, I hadn't intended for this to get personal, but, for the sake of illustration I am going to insert some of my own experience into the story.

Back in March of 2020, I went to my local hospital and recorded video of the temporary decontamination chamber set up outside of the emergency room. Now, I am located in rural Washington but less than an hour's drive from Seattle. At that time, the corporate media was telling us that Seattle hospitals were "overwhelmed" with folks dying from the Fauci Flu. We were being told that the Seattle hospitals were unable to deal with the influx of dying patients and that allegedly hundreds, possibly thousands, of patients had to be transported to other hospitals in the surrounding areas. That would include the local hospital in this town.

Sure enough, when I arrived at the hospital there was indeed an isolation/decontamination chamber set up outside of the emergency room. However, it was not in use. There were no first responders in hazmat suits. There were no ambulances arriving with fresh cases of the allegedly deadly infection. The place was like a ghost town, very quiet. [6]

I recorded video of this and uploaded it to YouTube. The clips in which I remained silent were allowed to remain on the platform. However, YouTube censors deleted the one video in which I gave a running commentary explaining where this was happening (or, rather, nothing was happening) and contrasted that with what the corporate media was saying about the need for more hospital beds and ventilators.

I made no claims about the virus. I made no claims about the pandemic being a fraud. I made no claims about the possibility of fentanyl overdose being partially responsible for the death count rising. I simply explained why the video was relevant to the ongoing narrative of the pandemic panic. Nothing in the video violated any of the terms of service but it was deleted for an alleged "violation of community standards" with no means of appealing that arbitrary decision.

That's not suspicious at all, is it?

To add to this, the Army set up a 250 bed field hospital in Seattle for what we were told was going to be a tsunami of Covid patients unable to breathe. However, only 3 short days later, that field hospital was disassembled and removed without having treated a single patient. Untold millions of dollars were spent treating no one. However the corporate media consuming public were treated to the images of the field hospital being set up as the gullible viewers were being set up to believe the fraudulent claim of it's dire necessity. But, then, poof! Like a magician's smoke bomb assisted disappearing act, it was gone leaving behind only the memory of a trick and the lingering odor of something rotten. [7]

Another thing that disappeared was the photos and video of first responders in hazmat suits. These images have disappeared from the corporate media, except for in cases of law enforcement agencies responding to incidents of possible exposure to fentanyl and fentanyl analogues. [8][9]

What a wacky coincidence!

Yes, the police continue to use hazmat gear in dealing with Fentanyl Fever. This is due to numerous officers requiring medical treatment and administration of nalaxone upon contact with fentanyl in either powder or liquid form. [10][11][12]

However, despite the numerous cases in which LEOs were affected by fentanyl and fentanyl analogues exposure to varying degrees of incapacitation, there are many in the corporate media who have been quick to dismiss these incidents as "myths". Yes, the dozens of first responders, both LEO and EMT, who have reported their being affected by fentanyl exposure are dismissed as suffering from nothing more than a panic attack. Nevermind the several who have required multiple doses of nalaxone to remain conscious and breathing, it was all in their heads according to people who are neither first responders nor medical professionals nor psychology experts. [13][14][15][16]

Even if we take the attempted debunking by these referenced reporters as sincere and legit, that doesn't disprove the long list of cases in which LEOs and EMTs were affected by fentanyl exposure.

At best, they can argue the semantics of whether or not these incidents should be referred to as "overdose" when the affected individuals were for the most part merely made to feel dizzy and short of breath. However, that still does not render overdose from skin contact an impossibility. Nevermind that many of the reported incidents involve not mere exposure by way of skin contact but rather resulted from inhalation of fentanyl powder.

As for the transdermal route of fentanyl exposure and the possibility of overdose by this means, one of the side effects of fentanyl consumption is sweating. Sweating increases the likelihood of fentanyl powder being absorbed through skin contact as fentanyl and fentanyl analogues are water soluble and human skin is permeable. [17]

Absorbing the drug through the skin is not just a distinct possibility, it's been prescribed in transdermal patch form for several years. Fentanyl users are known to extract the liquid form of fentanyl from these patches. It's possible for a LEO or EMT to unknowingly come into contact with this liquid that has been extracted from the patch by a drug abuser. [18][19]

But, surely, these journalists have more expertise on the subject of fentanyl exposure and the possibility of overdose than anyone working for the DEA, CDC or the EPA, right? So, feel free to ignore the warnings and guidance from those agencies, because someone with a degree in the humanities says that they are perpetuating "myths". [20]

Additionally these numerous "debunkings" bring up the question of why it's acceptable for the corporate media to feature articles and editorials which downplay the danger of a drug that has killed tens of thousands of Americans when it's unacceptable to in any way question the credibility of the pushers of the pandemic lockdown panic. What gives?

If anyone who dared to question the official story of the alleged virus was promptly banned from Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, then, why are these reporters who question the official story of fentanyl exposure risks allowed to remain active? Are they not denying science and spreading dangerous false information by downplaying the risks of a drug for which we have laboratory confirmation of it having killed hundreds of thousands of people across the globe?

If people who dare to question the credibility of Fauci are screamed at for being responsible for killing the elderly, can these reporters who downplay the risks of fentanyl overdose not, in a similar but more credible fashion, be held responsible for the overdose deaths among their readership? Could they not be considered as accessories to murder?

Speaking of murder, watch for part 5 in this series. It's going to be killer!

All references are in the resources section.

If you enjoyed reading this thought provoking exploration of current events, be sure to give a THUMBS UP and SUBSCRIBE.

If you appreciate the work I put into this and you are feeling generous, you can tip me with tokens right here. Tips are greatly appreciated and will help me to produce more content on a consistent basis. Much thanks for everyone who shows their support!

Thanks for hanging in there and reading all the way through, much appreciated!

- Marvin Scott Marvin, July 4th, 2021
[Originally published on Minds]
https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1258380929713537024