Gaming took it hard in the butt last cycle, rightfully so, because the shit sucked and served only as financial vehicles for project teams. This time around is different. The industry has had two washout cycles, so anyone left standing now is fully legit.

Even better, we now have benchmarks from which to judge new projects. You can make money taking stuff like $YGG or $MAGIC on leverage, or go balls out with the project I'm sending right now, MXS Games.

The name sucks. They'll have to rebrand that. But the MXS Games token, $XSEED, is grossly undervalued. It just crossed the $0.001 mark, which was resistance for a while, which means a new breed of investor will now have cause to ape in. But we're not talking just TA here. TA can get you a 2 or 3X, sure. Your 100-100Xs are made off fundies.

$XSEED fundies:

1. A setup that reminds me of $MAGIC, with games easily accessible and organised by type.

2. Tons of games already set to go.

3. A financial infrastructure reminiscent of $MYRIA. It's a node-based token release program with payouts similar to Myria, so we know it's sustainable through bear markets.

4. Community stats close to TreasureDAO. A little less traction, but the program isn't fully rolled out yet.

5. Already went through launch problems (XBorg) that didn't tank the program. This is a huge tell on the strength of a team; everyone looks like a genius when everything is going well. It's when something goes left that you see what a project is made of.

All this with a market capitalisation of less than $1M. All the other projects I mentioned are at least $50M. So if you have a project with similar everything, and the market is bigger so it can absorb more projects...

Plus crypto gaming as a whole will probably 5-10X itself over last cycle...

Plus it's on Avalanche, a chain that is doing quite well backing its gaming projects like a true publisher...

$XSEED looks like a winner, baby.

t.me/alucard0x - community

t.me/kolabworld - project