ETH Transaction Fees now account for 30% of miner rewards. This is potentially VERY BAD.

ETH Transaction Fees now account for 30% of miner rewards. This is potentially VERY BAD.

By FarewelltoMinds | Farewell2Minds | 3 Aug 2020


As the gas fees on ETH have grown with its use, fueled mostly by shitcoins and scams (as I have proved to you previously, using data based on the highest gas burners) fees now comprise over 30% of miner revenue. 

Coinmetrics.io reports on this, found here. Their graphic is shared below. 

667b9b08793447b1e3403b2b150b4dd4db8d9d4ecca67870f176fc0fdfcad9de.png

The green, representing miner revenue from fees, had a nice bounce and peak at the end of the last bullrun in 2018, reaching another high in Huly of 2018 then stabilizing. At the start of this year, the rewards based on fee revenue have skyrocketed. Coinmetrics says this amounts to about 3,800 ETH per DAY. 

What consequences are there for this? 

Vitalik himself has said this is, bluntly, very bad. 

https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1285593115672358912?s=20

How? This developer of the ETH game, flowerpatch, has a great analysis on the problem. 

Basically, it was assumed the blocks have the same value. Now, that isn't true. Some blocks are more valuable than others (re: the blocks with more fees). 

Image for post

Taken from the BTC whitepaper, it shows the dilemma. Mine block as the above, and get $5, or mine the block as below, taking $55 and enticing a miner to follow along with you, that miner earning $50. The bottom would result in a fork. 

If the blocksize of ETH increased by 4, and the fee rewards of one block were 30%, that could turn into a 120% increase in fee rewards. The result is that miners no longer care about blocks, but about fees, and follow only the blocks that can garner those fees. 

One way this can happen is through mining gaps, that is, there aren't enough fees and the block isn't worth much, so lower level miners turn off their machines. Those that remain could choose to fork the network through a 51% attack. There are also many other strategies that bad actors could employ. 

To quote the BTC whitepaper: 

“Essentially what winds up happening is that while the selfish miner mines the same fraction of blocks in either reward model, the selfish miner’s blocks will tend to be larger. In the block-reward model, this doesn’t matter because all blocks are worth the same, but in the transaction fees model this means the selfish miner gets greater reward.”

When ETH2 comes out, sometime in the future, block rewards will not be competitive, but shared. This should fix this problem. But it remains a problem until then! And as we've seen, the plans of ETH2 have always been delayed. 

Until ETH2 and EIP 1559, it looks like we will see ETH fees doing one thing only: increasing in cost! 

 


FarewelltoMinds
FarewelltoMinds

Trying my best to stay rational in an irrational world.


Farewell2Minds
Farewell2Minds

Crypto news, unheard of alt coins, investments as gamblings and self-hating decentralized financial musings

Send a $0.01 microtip in crypto to the author, and earn yourself as you read!

20% to author / 80% to me.
We pay the tips from our rewards pool.