Craig Wright is rapidly emerging from the phase in which he aroused anger in the community and is entering a new phase in which the only thing that arouses is an irrepressible hilarity; the businessman insists on wanting to pass himself off as Satoshi Nakamoto (the inventor of bitcoin) but every attempt drags him more and more into ridicule. This time he tried it during an interview published by Modern Consensus on December 19 last year and the irrefutable proof, according to him, which would finally show that behind the invention of bitcoin there would actually be him is even a handwritten note of his Punch; so to speak, it is as if I presented a written note of mine in which I say I am Napoleon as proof of the fact that I am truly Napoleon. Let's go in order and explain in detail what happened because it's really one of the most hilarious things I've ever found to comment on; therefore, during the aforementioned interview Craig Wright wanted to explain where Satoshi Nakamoto's name derives from and to demonstrate that everything he told is true he presented a written note in his own hand on a document dated January 5, 2008. The document was an article dealing with such a Tominaga Nakamoto, who lived in Japan in the first half of the eighteenth century; demonstrating the fact that from that document the good Wright would have drawn inspiration to devise what is probably the most famous pseudonym in the history of humanity, a note written in his own hand that reports the following:

Nakamoto is the Japanese Adam Smith. Honest Register + Micro Cash. Satoshi is intelligent history. Not too difficult

Now, even a child understands that he may have stumbled upon the article in question the day before, adding a note in pen; the fact that the article dates back to 2008 does not in fact demonstrate that the known addition of its own hand was also written in 2008. Another consideration should then be made, namely that we know almost nothing about Satoshi Nakamoto, but we know one thing, he was certainly a very intelligent and brilliant person, which clearly Craig Wright is not; how could one ever accept that an intelligent person like Satoshi could ever delude himself that a handwritten note on an article represents proof? Also because of how valid evidence is provided in a context in which there is no mutual trust Satoshi (the real one) was an expert, perhaps one of the greatest experts who ever existed; especially since, as is known, to prove irrefutably that you are the true Satoshi it would be enough to move the bitcoins that are kept by the wallets that we know were his property, funds that, however, looks a bit strange, Craig Wright refuses to move, while presenting evidence that not even a six-year-old would believe. In the same interview, later, the entrepreneur also explains where the choice of the name Satoshi would come from, which would mean "intelligent learning", pity only that this is also false; just do a quick google search to trace the real meaning of the name Satoshi (a very common name in Japan) which, as wikipedia reports:

It is based on the Japanese 聡 and means "who thinks clearly", insightful, wise

In short, every time Craig Wright opens his mouth there is never, not even by chance, nothing that appears even remotely as true; not only that, every time he tries to prove himself the real Satoshi Nakamoto does nothing but obtain the exact opposite, more and more convincing anyone with a minimum of brain that in reality he is only a braggart, as when in a court he presented a document with a date prior to that in which the font with which the document was written was invented. We are therefore clearly faced with a serial liar, but we already knew this; there is good that old Craig always makes us laugh a lot, maybe he will not go down in history to be the inventor of bitcoin but he will surely be remembered as one of the most successful clowns in the history of humanity.