You are reading an excerpt from our free but shortened abridged report! While still packed with incredible research and data, for just $20/month you can upgrade to our FULL library of 50+ reports (including this one) and complete industry-leading analysis on the top crypto assets. 

Becoming a Premium member means enjoying all the perks of a Basic membership PLUS:

• Full-length CORE Reports: More technical, in-depth research, actionable insights, and potential market alpha for serious crypto users
• Early access to future CORE ratings: Being early is sometimes just as important as being right!
• Premium Member CORE+ Reports: Coverage on the top issues pertaining to crypto users like bridge security, layer two solutions, DeFi plays, and more
• CORE report Audio playback: Don’t want to read? No problem! Listen on the go.

The Urgency of Security in the Web3 Sphere

In the rapidly evolving world of Web3, the urgency of security cannot be overstated. The sphere has witnessed a significant number of hacks and security incidents, underscoring the critical need for robust protective measures. The complexities of Web3 security are multifaceted, involving various dependencies such as oracles, blockchain networks, and hosting services. These complexities, coupled with the absence of centralized governance, make identifying and mitigating security threats a challenging endeavor.

The Web3 security stack is a complex and multifaceted framework designed to protect crypto applications, organizations, and their users from malicious attacks. These attacks often exploit defects in various areas, including smart contract programming languages, business logic errors, and compromised infrastructure. This article delves into the various verticals that currently constitute the Web3 security landscape, offering insights into the strategies and tools employed to fortify the crypto ecosystem.

Strategies for Enhancing Security

Auditing and Approval

One prevalent strategy employed by Web3 projects is the engagement of specialized companies to conduct comprehensive audits of their smart contract code. These audits serve as an in-depth review of the project, culminating in a stamp of approval that signifies adherence to security standards. This approach provides an essential layer of trust and assurance for both developers and users.

Audits typically culminate in a report that details the auditors' observations about the system's security. This report often highlights security issues discovered during the inspection of the project's codebase and provides recommendations for rectifying these issues before launching the application for public use.

While manual inspection by expert auditors is valuable, it can be challenging to scale, leading to delays before deploying to the mainnet. To address this, more audit companies are developing proprietary and open-source software designed for automatic vulnerability detection.

Questions users should ask about their blockchain/protocol team:

• How does the team respond to audits?
• How many high severity issues are raised?
• Are they addressed in a timely manner?
• What is the time since last audit or since a contract went live?

Formal Verification

While audits can uncover errors, they cannot guarantee that a smart contract will always execute correctly. Formal verification, on the other hand, can prove that a smart contract adheres to the provided specifications, offering robust assurances of a protocol's security and reliability.

Formal verification involves translating a smart contract's code into an abstract mathematical representation and creating a formal specification that outlines the contract's desired behaviors. Companies like Runtime Verification, ConsenSys Diligence, and Veridise offer formal verification services, and the adoption of automated verification tools like Cerotra and Scribble is on the rise.

Additionally, other chains, like Tezos utilize formal verification at the protocol level.The Tezos blockchain uses the Michelson language to implement smart contract features in a similar way to which the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) is used on Ethereum. However, the scope of Michelson is more limited to creating smart contracts as pieces of business logic rather than as virtual machines. The result is a pared-down language more suited to a particular focus, in this case, blockchain smart contracts, and an increased assurance of correctness. Michelson allows for formal verification which enables users to mathematically prove the properties and correctness of the smart contract and potentially avoid vulnerabilities, such as the one observed in The DAO Attack. 

Other avenues for Web3 security include:

• Blockchain Forensics: Tracing and Compliance: Blockchain forensics companies specialize in analyzing blockchain data to detect financial crimes involving cryptocurrencies. They play a pivotal role in tracing the flow of funds after crypto hacks and scams, de-anonymizing criminal actors, and assisting DeFi protocols in recovering stolen funds.
• Secure Key Management: The security of private keys and seed phrases is a critical concern. Multisignature wallet technology and multiparty-computation (MPC) offer solutions to this challenge. Providers like Safe, BitGo, Qredo, GK8, Fordefi, and Fireblocks are pioneering this space.

No system can ever be considered entirely secure in perpetuity. This reality underscores the wisdom of employing multiple layers of security, such as combining audits with bug bounty programs. By encouraging a diverse array of security researchers to scrutinize code, projects can leverage a wide range of skill sets to enhance their resilience.

Conclusion

The landscape of blockchain security is vast and multifaceted, encompassing forensic analysis, protocol risk management, and user security. As the crypto ecosystem continues to evolve, the importance of these security measures cannot be overstated.

Blockchain forensics is bridging the gap between traditional finance and the crypto world, ensuring compliance and tracing illicit activities. Protocol risk management is moving beyond code vulnerabilities to address economic mechanisms, while user security is empowering individuals with tools to protect their assets.

The collaborative efforts of innovative companies, developers, and security experts are shaping a resilient and secure blockchain environment. As we navigate this complex landscape, the ongoing development and adoption of robust security measures will remain central to the integrity and growth of the blockchain and cryptocurrency space.